Bagwell v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Mikell, Judge.
A jury convicted Robert Bagwell of driving under the influence of alcohol (“DUI”) to the extent it was less safe for him to drive 1 and driving while his alcohol concentration was more than 0.10 grams (a “per se” violation). 2 On appeal, Bagwell argues that his two prior DUIs and his breath test results were erroneously admitted in evidence. He also challenges the denial of his motion for directed verdict on the per se charge. We affirm.
Sergeant Craig Cannon of the City of Conyers Police Department testified that on March 13, 1998, he observed Bagwell’s vehicle exit a parking…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Stephens v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Lattarulo v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Brooks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Fields v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Viau v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
- Totino v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- Dozier v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- Miller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- Whittaker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.