Legal Opinion
Burstein v. Applied Extrusion Technologies, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided August 25, 1992No. Civ. A. 91-712 LONPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LONGOBARDI, Chief Judge.
The Plaintiff filed this action in December, 1991, alleging that the Defendants violated certain provisions of the Securities Act of 1933 (“the ’33 Act”), the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“the ’34 Act”), Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Commission and the common law of misrepresentation. Pending before the Court is a motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) to transfer this action 1 to the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. Docket Item (“D.I.”) 12.
BACKGROUND
Applied Extrusion Technologies, Inc. (“AET” or the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Shutte v. Armco Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Robert S. Solomon v. Continental American Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- S-G Securities, Inc. v. Fuqua Investment Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1979
- Waste Distillation Technology, Inc. v. Pan American Resources, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Leucadia, Inc. v. Applied Extrusion Technologies, Inc., Richard I. Burstein, Proposed IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Koh v. Microtek International, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2003
- NCR Credit Corp. v. Ye Seekers Horizon, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Cognitronics Imaging Systems, Inc. v. Recognition Research Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2000
- National Property Investors VIII v. Shell Oil Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.