Legal Opinion

Ex parte Chavez

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 3, 2018No. WR-68,051-03PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[T]he sheriff has a right to determine the safety of the community in the courtroom based on his experience with what this man has done. Because he's been charged with that-and the State believes it did happen-the ankle bracelets are a very minor thing to keep him in control. But he is charged with that assault, Your Honor, and attempted jail escape.

Defense counsel stated that it was his understanding that Applicant was wearing a "shock belt," but the bailiff and the prosecutor responded that Applicant was not in fact wearing a shock belt because they "decided not to do it."

The trial judge…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Rylander v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
  4. Deck v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Cooks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Darius Castille v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2026
  2. Ex Parte Adelio Alexander Barahona, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2021
  3. Ex Parte Oscar Acuna, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2019
  4. Gerald Gene Green v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2019
  5. Glenda Coreasmachado v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2024

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API