Legal Opinion

Ort v. Hutchinson

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 21, 1961No. 221PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGuernsey, P. J.

This action in mandamus was filed in this court by one Robert N. Ort. The caption and style of the amended petition, which for the purposes of clarity we will hereafter refer to as the petition, are as in an action brought in the name of an individual, and there is no allegation that the action is brought in the name of the state of Ohio on the relation of Ort. The defendants are the Mayor and the Civil Service Commission of the city of Defiance.

After formal allegations, Ort alleges that the commission caused notice to be published on or about March 19, 1960, of an examination to be given on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gannon v. GallagherOhio Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Leonard v. SweetzerOhio Supreme Court · 1847
  3. City of Toledo v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Ohio Electric Railway Co. v. U. S. Express Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1922
  5. L. & M. Properties Co. v. BurkeOhio Supreme Court · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Warren v. RossOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. State Ex Rel. Cosmos Broadcasting Corp. v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API