United States v. Pugh
District Court, D. Guam
1Opinion of the Court
SHRIVER, District Judge.
The defendant was convicted of violating Section 641 of Title 18 of the United States Code. He appealed and his appeal was dismissed by the Circuit Court of Appeals under date of May 29, 1952, 9 Cir., 197 F.2d 509, upon the basis that his motion for a new trial had not been filed in time. Upon receipt of the mandate the defendant surrendered and began the service of his sentence. After the hearing on the present motion I enlarged the defendant upon bail .because of grave jurisdictional questions hereafter discussed. The defendant moved to vacate judgment and sentence…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Balzac v. Porto RicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- United States v. BehrmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Bernhardt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948
- Pugh v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- United States v. SeagravesDistrict Court, D. Guam · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pugh v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- Bradshaw v. State of OklahomaDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1975
- Pugh v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954