Watson v. Massachusetts Mut. Life Ins. Co.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Associate Justice.
The complaint in this case alleges the following facts: One Richardson was indebted to the plaintiff in an amount which is not disclosed. Plaintiff desired to protect that obligation. He requested defendant insurance company to issue a policy on Richardson’s life which irrevocably made him the sole beneficiary. Defendant’s agents refused to issue such a policy, but in lieu thereof offered to issue a policy on his debtor, Richardson’s, life payable to Richardson’s estate, and to accept from Richardson an absolute assignment to the plaintiff. Defendant represented to…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Central Bank of Washington v. HumeSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Grigsby v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- New York Life Insurance v. ViglasSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Lovell v. St. Louis Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Berry v. American Central Insurance Co. of St. LouisNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ross Langdon v. Maryland Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
- Ross Langdon v. Maryland Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966