Legal Opinion

In Re Detention of Paschke

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 4, 2007No. 18812-4-IIIPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

150 P.3d 586 (2007)

In re the DETENTION OF Herman Ross PASCHKE, Petitioner.

No. 18812-4-III.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3.

January 4, 2007.

Cynthia Ann Jordan, Attorney at Law, Spokane, WA, for Appellant.

Sarah Sappington, Office of the Atty. General, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.

BROWN, J.

¶ 1 We previously held that proof of a recent overt act was not required under the unique facts of Herman Paschke's case. In re Det. of Paschke, 121 Wash.App. 614, 624, 90 P.3d 74 (2004). Our Supreme Court granted review, and remanded back to this court for reconsideration in light of In re Detention…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In re the Detention of AlbrechtWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. LintonWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Detention of Marshall v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. In Re AlbrechtWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  5. In re the Detention of BrotenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Detention of PostCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  2. In re the Detention of PostCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API