Legal Opinion

Richard v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided April 26, 1990No. 01-88-00634-CRPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

O’CONNOR, Justice.

This is an appeal from a conviction of aggravated robbery. The trial court found David Cleo Richard, appellant, guilty and assessed his punishment at 30 years confinement. We affirm.

The State indicted appellant for aggravated robbery. 1 Before trial, appellant filed a motion for probation. The motion for probation was a fill-in-the-blank form provided by the trial court. Appellant filled in the cause number, his name, the offense of “aggravated robbery,” and other information. Part of the printed form read:

[Appellant asks], if ... the punishment does not exceed ten…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McNew v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  2. Ex Parte WilliamsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  3. Fuentes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  4. West v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  5. Powers v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Nicholas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
  2. Ribelin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1999
  3. Singleton v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1999
  4. Downs v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2004
  5. Soto v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API