Richard v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
O’CONNOR, Justice.
This is an appeal from a conviction of aggravated robbery. The trial court found David Cleo Richard, appellant, guilty and assessed his punishment at 30 years confinement. We affirm.
The State indicted appellant for aggravated robbery. 1 Before trial, appellant filed a motion for probation. The motion for probation was a fill-in-the-blank form provided by the trial court. Appellant filled in the cause number, his name, the offense of “aggravated robbery,” and other information. Part of the printed form read:
[Appellant asks], if ... the punishment does not exceed ten…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McNew v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Ex Parte WilliamsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Fuentes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- West v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Powers v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Nicholas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
- Ribelin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Singleton v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1999
- Downs v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2004
- Soto v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.