Legal Opinion

Proctor v. Ingalls Shipbuilding Corp.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1966No. 43821PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, Justice.

This suit by dependents for death benefits under the Workmen’s Compensation Act on account of an alleged injury, which it is charged later caused the death of the husband and father, comes here from the Circuit Court of Jackson County which affirmed an order of the Commission denying benefits. We affirm.

We believe it is unnecessary to discuss any issue presented other than that of res judicata which arises from these facts:

During 1961 Samuel A. Proctor filed claim for disability benefits because of an injury said to have been received by him in the course and scope of his…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Wray v. . Woolen MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  2. Besonen v. CampbellMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Industrial Commission v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Martin v. White Pine Lumber Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Collins v. HallSupreme Court of Florida · 1934

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. EspinosaMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Ingalls Shipbuilding Corp. v. Dependents of HarrisMississippi Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Knox Glass Co. v. Dependents of EvansMississippi Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Smith v. CompFirst/L.C. IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API