Legal Opinion

Handwerker v. Ensley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 13, 1999PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Emily Goodman, J.), entered May 12, 1998, as amended July 2, 1998, which enjoined defendant from commencing a proceeding in Civil Court for possession or co-occupancy of premises, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the preliminary injunction vacated, and the proceeding dismissed, without prejudice to defendant’s commencement of a summary holdover proceeding in Civil Court.

Ensley became the tenant of a loft art studio/apartment in the Soho district of Manhattan in 1984, and has spent an estimated $110,000 on its renovation. In 1993 she…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cox v. J.D. Realty AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. East 41st Street Associates v. 18 East 42nd Street, L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. 520 East 81st Street Associates v. Roughton-HesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. Scheff v. 230 East 73rd Owners Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  5. Kanter v. East 62nd Street AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. BLF Realty Holding Corp. v. KasherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. 270 Riverside Drive, Inc. v. BraunAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2004
  3. House of Bowery Corp. v. EnsleyCivil Court of the City of New York · 1999
  4. First Hudson Capital, LLC v. SeabornAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. Giachino Enterprises L.P. v. InokuchiCivil Court of the City of New York · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API