Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Mahan v. NTC of America & Fireman's Fund Indemnity Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 21, 1992No. 73254Published

1ConcurrenceOp Ala, Chief Justice

The court has granted certiorari to review certain “jurisdictional facts” in an appeal from the Workers’ Compensation Court. Today’s opinion concludes that the claimant, when injured, did not stand in an employment relationship to the respondent. While I join in today’s holding, I write separately to explain the conceptual and historical underpinnings for Oklahoma’s appellate de novo examination of compensation claimant’s employment status and to reaffirm that review standard’s earlier birth and current dimension as a state constitutional-law norm.

I

STATE FUNDAMENTAL LAW MANDATES DE NOVO…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Ohio Valley Water Co. v. Ben Avon BoroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. David W. CAREY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  5. McKeever Drilling Co. v. EgbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API