Legal Opinion

State Highway Department v. Hilliard

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 20, 1965No. 41557PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deen, Judge.

1. In this condemnation case the court instructed the jury as follows: “I charge you, gentlemen, that the word ‘value’ as used in the law relating to eminent domain or condemnation in Georgia is a relative term, depending upon the circumstances, and in determining such value, the measure of damages is not necessarily the market value, but may be the fair and reasonable value of the property taken, if you find that the market value would not coincide with the actual value of the property taken. Now, in determining just and adequate compensation under the constitutional provision,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City Council v. LamarCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
  2. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF SAVANNAH v. SAVANNAH &C. WORKS, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  3. Grooms v. GroomsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  4. Georgia Power Company v. PittmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  5. City of Atlanta v. GoreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dent v. Memorial Hospital of AdelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  2. Department of Transportation v. KatzCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  3. Flexible Products Co. v. ErvastCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  4. Rizer v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  5. Trust Co. of Columbus v. KiteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API