Legal Opinion

Kaneko v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California

Decided August 31, 1908No. 1,345PublishedCited by 2 opinions

At Law. On demurrer to complaint.

1Opinion of the Court

WELLBORN, District Judge.

This is an action brought by an administrator to recover damages for the death of his intestate, at the time a resident of Riverside county, Cal., alleged to have been occasioned through the negligence of the defendants. The heirs are a. widow and three children, subjects of the emperor of Japan and residents of that country, and neither of whom has ever been in the United States. The abstract and only question raised by the demur-ref is whether or not, under section 377 of the Code of Civil Procedure of California, nonresident aliens, who are heirs of the deceased,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Augusta Railway Co. v. GloverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  2. Mulhall v. FallonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  3. Chesapeake, Ohio & Southwestern Railroad v. HigginsTennessee Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Philpott v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  5. Deni v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lykiardopoulo v. New Orleans & C. R., Light & PowerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
  2. Madera Sugar Pine Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API