Legal Opinion
Varner v. Thomson
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided April 19, 1934No. 23511PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.
1. A brief of the evidence being essential to a valid motion for a new trial, the motion is subject to dismissal where it is unaccompanied by such a brief. Moxley v. Ga. Ry. &c. Co., 122 Ga. 493 (50 S. E. 339); Baker v. Johnson, 99 Ga. 374 (27 S. E. 706); Holloman v. Small, 111 Ga. 812 (35 S. E. 665); Taliaferro v. Columbus R. Co., 130 Ga. 570 (61 S. E. 228); Whitaker v. State, 138 Ga. 139 (75 S. E. 254); Firemen’s Insurance Co. v. Oliver, 176 Ga. 80, 82 (167 S. E. 99); Currin v. Newbern, 43 Ga. App. 332 (158 S. E. 771). There being no brief of evidence filed in this case with the motion for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Baker v. Johnson & HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
- Reed v. WarnockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
- Whitaker v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Moxley v. Georgia Railway & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Firemen's Insurance v. OliverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Beavers v. LesueurSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Powell v. WeeksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- Grant v. State Highway DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Hazen v. Isaac Fass Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1943