Legal Opinion

In Re the Marriage of Swan

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 18, 1995No. 93-1388PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERNUS, Justice.

This case presents several issues but only one of first impression. Appellee Brent Swan received a lump-sum payment of workers’ compensation benefits. His former wife, appellant Cynthia Swan, claims that this payment should be considered as income for purposes of determining Brent’s current child support obligation. We agree. However the district court and court of appeals, without explanation, ordered Brent to pay child support in an amount below the payment required by the child support guidelines when Brent’s workers’ compensation payment is considered. Therefore, we vacate…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Deaver v. Armstrong Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  2. State v. LipcamonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
  3. Nicolls v. NicollsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  4. In Re the Marriage of SullivanMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  5. In Re the Marriage of WegnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of SchrinerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  2. In Re the Marriage of WaltersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  3. Brockman v. BrockmanNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  4. In Re the Marriage of HagerlaCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2005
  5. In re Marriage of AragonColorado Court of Appeals · 2019

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API