State v. Lipcamon

SCHULTZ, Justice.

We must decide whether the trial court erred by failing to hold a party in contempt of court for violating a no contact order issued after the party was charged with domestic abuse assault. The trial court stated that defendant Rose Marie Lipca- mon made contacts with her husband John, but “the contacts were such that they were not so egregious or unreasonable that a finding of contempt beyond a reasonable doubt is warranted.” The State sought and we granted further review of this ruling. We affirm.

On January 28, 1991, defendant was charged with domestic abuse assault…