Legal Opinion

Perrine v. Comstock

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 2, 1931No. Docket No. 6921Published

1Opinion of the Court

BISHOP, J., pro tem.

Appellant presents two appeals, both from orders denying him relief from his default in not preparing and serving a proposed bill of exceptions within time. Appellant having been unsuccessful in a trial had before the court without a jury, judgment in favor of the several defendants and against him was entered February 19, 1929. Notice of this entry was served upon appellant February 23d, and on February 26th he filed his notice of intention to move for a new trial. This last-mentioned notice was served upon the attorneys for defendants Comstock and Nyberg only, not upon…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hamaker v. KeatingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Lantz v. ValCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Victor Power and Mining Co. v. ColeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
  4. Keown v. California Pacific Realty Co.California Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API