Legal Opinion

Burkart v. Toraason

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 18, 1982No. 81-738PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Heiple

This is an appeal of a garnishment judgment in favor of the garnisher. In a previous and underlying proceeding, plaintiff, Laura Bur kart, who is the garnisher in this proceeding, obtained a $350,000 judgment against Mary Toraason, defendant. That judgment debt was insured to the extent of $100,000 by the garnishee, the Medical Protective Company of Fort Wayne, Indiana (“Medical Protective”). Medical Protective attempted to dismiss the garnishment action. A La Salle County Circuit Judge ruled for plaintiff. The garnishee appeals. Ill. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch. 62, par. 52.

The facts are undisputed.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schneider v. Autoist Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Ancateau ex rel. Trust Co. of Chicago v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1943
  3. Colon v. MarzecAppellate Court of Illinois · 1969
  4. Conley v. SingletonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  5. Cuttone v. PetersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. SwedishAmerican Hospital Ass'n v. Illinois State Medical Inter-Insurance ExchangeAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  2. Insurance Co. of North America v. Cape Industries, Ltd.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  3. Hurley v. Gaertner (In Re Hurley)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
  4. Sampson v. Cape Industries Ltd.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  5. Burkart v. ToraasonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API