Legal Opinion
Cronin v. Cronin
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 16, 1986PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Vincent R. Balletta, Jr., J.
Motion by the defendant for leave to amend his answers to *880interrogatories, and cross motion by the plaintiff for leave to amend her answers to interrogatories, inter alia, are determined as follows:
In this matrimonial action, the defendant seeks leave to amend his answers to interrogatories pursuant to CPLR 3134 (c) so as to include a reference to a claimed equitable distribution in the plaintiff’s law degree. It is conceded that the plaintiff graduated from law school in 1976 and that she was admitted to the Bar in 1977. The parties were…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- O'Brien v. O'BrienNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Arvantides v. ArvantidesNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- People Ex Rel. Bennett v. LamanNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Lesman v. LesmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Conner v. ConnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Marcus v. MarcusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- McGowan v. McGowanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Díaz v. Rafael AlcaláSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1996
- Finocchio v. FinocchioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Hoak v. HoakWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.