Legal Opinion

Matheny v. Preston Hotel Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1918PublishedCited by 10 opinions

FROM HENRY. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Henry Conn-, ty. — J. W. Ross, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Neil

In January,' 1910, complainants leased from defendant for the period of one year its hotel building, at a rental of $110 per month, evidenced by twelve promissory notes, maturing respectively January 30th, February 28th, March 30th, and so on through the year. At the close of the term complainants continued in possession, but without any further formal contract, executing, however, their twelve promissory notes, for the same amounts, and maturing as during the preceding year, covering the year 1911. At the close of that year complainant remained in possession as during the two preceding…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  2. Marshall v. John Grosse Clothing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Whitaker v. HawleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  4. Nathans v. . HopeNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  5. Mobile & Ohio Railroad v. MatthewsTennessee Supreme Court · 1905

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Jones v. Morris Plan BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1937
  2. Globe & Rutgers Fire Ins. v. ClevelandTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Schmid v. Baum's Home of Flowers, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Wright v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1991
  5. Brummitt Tire Co. v. Sinclair Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API