Legal Opinion · Dissent

Brandon Charter Township v. Tippett

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 6, 2000No. Docket 208705Published

1Dissent

Hood, RJ.

(dissenting). I respectfully dissent from the majority’s conclusion that its inteipretation of the ordinance does not lead to absurd results.

On appeal, defendant asserts that he may engage in farming operations in Marlette, Michigan, and still qualify for the exemption. I disagree. Plaintiff’s zoning ordinance addressed the storage of vehicles on private property and provides:

10. Parking and storing of commercial trailers, trucks and or equipment with a rated capacity exceeding 10,000 pound G.V.W. subject to the following conditions:

A. Minimum acreage required shall be 10 acres.

B.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Quinto v. Cross and Peters Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Popma v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'n.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Adrian School District v. Michigan Public School Employees' Retirement SystemMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Burt Township v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Ahearn v. Bloomfield Charter TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API