Legal Opinion

State v. Wilson

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 1995No. 1994-1272PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 73 Ohio St.3d 40.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. WILSON, APPELLEE. [Cite as State v. Wilson,

1995-Ohio-217.] Juvenile law—Absent bindover procedure, juvenile court has exclusive subject matter jurisdiction in delinquency cases—R.C. 2151.23, 2151.25 and 2151.26(E), applied—Exclusive jurisdiction of juvenile court cannot be waived. 1. Absent a proper bindover procedure pursuant to R.C. 2151.26, the juvenile court has the exclusive subject matter jurisdiction over any case concerning a child who is alleged to be a delinquent. (R.C.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. PerryOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Patton v. DiemerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. MilanovichOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. Sharp, 08 Ca 000002 (4-20-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. State v. FryerOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. DeChellis v. Estate of DeChellisOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. State v. ThomasOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API