Legal Opinion

Wright v. Fox-Stanley Photo Products, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 7, 1982No. 44321PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOWD, Presiding Judge.

Action for damages for personal injuries; verdict and judgment for plaintiff against defendant Fox-Stanley Photo, Inc., which has appealed and is hereinafter referred to as defendant. 1

Defendant alleges error in giving Instruction 5 at plaintiff’s request and in refusing Instruction B requested by defendant. Instruction 5 deals with the sufficiency of the evidence to support the submission that defendant drove at an excessive speed and that this excessive speed directly caused damage to the plaintiff. Instruction B deals with the withdrawal of plaintiff’s medical bills…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Skadal v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
  2. DeMoulin v. KissirMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Wise v. TowseMissouri Court of Appeals · 1963
  4. Green v. Crunden Martin Manufacturing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Bauman v. ConradMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Emery v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1998
  2. Vaughan v. Taft Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  3. Hatch v. V.P. Fair Foundation, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Brown v. Van NoyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Smith v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API