Legal Opinion
Coldicott v. W. C. & A. N. Miller Development Co.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided May 28, 1946No. 375PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAYTON, Chief Judge.
Defendant, a real estate broker, was sued for $2,500 which it had retained out of funds in its possession under a claim that such sum was due for a commission for the sale of plaintiff’s property. The trial court found for defendant and plaintiff appeals.
Plaintiff was the owner of property for which she authorized defendant to secure a tenant. Defendant produced as a prospect the Belgian Economic Mission. After some negotiations, plaintiff entered into a lease with said Mission, which lease was for three years at $750 per month and gave the lessee an option to purchase the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Schneidau v. ManleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- United States Trust Co. of New York v. SearsDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1939
- Gibbs v. People's National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
- Wolverton v. TuttleOregon Supreme Court · 1908
- Ames v. LamontWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Leo M. Bernstein & Co. Sales, Inc. v. MillerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
- Thomas v. JacksonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969