Henderson v. Odessa Bldg. & Finance Co.
Texas Commission of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtLeddx, J.
The principal insistence made by defendant in error in its motion for rehearing is that the evidence shows that, at the time plaintiff in error levied their execution upon the lot in controversy, it was in possession of said premises, . through a tenant, which fact charged plaintiff in error with notice of its rights.
The trial court found as a fact that, at the time the levy was made, plaintiffs in error had no notice of any claim to said property by defendant in error. Defendant in error, having failed to except to the findings of fact or judgment, will not be heard to complain of same on…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Continental Insurance v. MillikenTexas Supreme Court · 1885
- Jesse French Piano & Organ Co. v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904
- Buster v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904
- Drake v. Davidson & BaileyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902
- Meisner v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hardwicke v. Trinity Universal Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Bain v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
- Tyler Const. Co. v. Browning-Ferris MacH. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1942
- Fires v. Kinney-Shotts Inv. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Bain v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.