Legal Opinion
North Dakota v. Federal Power Commission
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided August 6, 1957No. 15669PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VOGEL, Circuit Judge.
The State of North Dakota and the Public Service Commission of North Dakota, petitioners herein, ask, pursuant to 15 U.S.C.A. § 717r, that this court review and modify or set aside in whole or in part an order of the Federal Power Commission, hereinafter referred to as the FPC, dated July 2, 1956, on which rehearing was denied August 20, 1956, wherein certain certificates of public convenience and necessity were issued to Montana-Dakota Utilities Company, Signal Oil and Gas Company and Amerada Petroleum Corporation and certain others were refused for lack of jurisdiction.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Michigan Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Tampa Phosphate Railroad Company v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Lo-Vaca Gathering Company, Houston Pipe Line Company and El Paso Natural Gas Company v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- State Of North Dakota v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1957
- Lo-Vaca Gathering Company, Houston Pipe Line Company and El Paso Natural Gas Company v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- Tampa Phosphate Railroad Company v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970