Legal Opinion

Ritter v. Portera

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 8, 1984No. 981, September Term, 1983PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERT, Chief Judge.

The parties seem to agree that the appellant, Sherry Lee Schiller (Schiller), 1 was guilty of contributory negligence when she started to perch herself on the hood of the motor vehicle of the appellee, Salvatore Anthony Portera (Port-era), 2 in order to ride “maybe fifty feet.” The parties seem to agree that Portera, the operator of the vehicle, was primarily negligent in moving the car while Schiller was sitting on or about to sit on the hood of the automobile. Where the parties disagree is over the conclusion by the trial judge that the “doctrine of last clear chance”…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Northern Central Railway Co. v. State ex rel. PriceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1868
  2. Maryland Central Railroad v. NeubeurCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1884
  3. Peregoy v. Western Maryland RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1953
  4. Menish v. Polinger CompanyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  5. West v. Belle Isle Cab Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Myers v. Estate of AlessiCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  2. Burdette v. ROCKVILLE CRANE RENTAL, CORP.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  3. Carter v. Senate Masonry, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  4. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. AndersonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  5. Palenchar v. JarrettDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API