Legal Opinion

Carter v. Senate Masonry, Inc.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 6, 2004No. 334 Sept. Term, 2002PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SONNER, Judge.

This appeal concerns the legal doctrine of “last clear chance.” Preston Carter accused an employee of Senate Masonry, Incorporated (“Senate”) of negligently harming him at a construction site. A jury in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County accepted that accusation, but found Carter negligent as well. Nonetheless, it awarded Carter damages, with the apparent belief that the Senate employee had the last clear chance to avoid the injury, and his failure to do so warranted compensation for Carter. The trial court disagreed and granted Senate’s post-trial motion for judgment…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Northern Central Railway Co. v. State ex rel. PriceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1868
  2. Liscombe v. Potomac Edison Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  3. Wholey v. RoebuckCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  4. Sears v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  5. Houston v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. AndersonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  2. Brady v. Walmart IncDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2024
  3. Carter v. Senate Masonry, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  4. Coleman v. Soccer Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  5. Janson v. Reithoffer Shows, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API