Legal Opinion

Grantham v. Potthoff-Rosene Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 16, 1964No. 51499PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompsoN, J.

— In the case at bar the defendants pleaded too much, and proved too little. Their case suffers, and dies, from a plethora of pleading and a paucity of proof. While several errors are assigned and several points are argued in the briefs, we find the first assigned error to be of controlling importance. It is thus stated: “1. The trial court erred when it found the verified pleadings of the defendants-appellees were of so little consequence that oral testimony carried greater weight than the allegations contained in the Counterclaim.”

For an understanding of the question involved some statement…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. TURNER, ADM'R v. McCreadyOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Home Indemnity Co. v. State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  3. Shipley v. ReasonerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
  4. Tischer v. City of Council BluffsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  5. Reynolds v. AllerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Citizens for Responsible Choices v. City of ShenandoahSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  2. Barnard v. Cedar Rapids City Cab Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1965
  3. Christianson v. KramerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1965
  4. Mills County State Bank v. FisherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  5. Hofer v. Bituminous Casualty CorporationSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API