Legal Opinion
Kade v. Workie
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided February 27, 2017No. Civil Action No. 16-179-RGAPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion
Richard G. Andrews, United States District Judge
Defendant Ahmed A. Mohamed is the sole defendant remaining. (D.I. 13). Presently before me is his Motion to Dismiss, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), all claims brought by Plaintiff Brittany Kade against him. (D.I. 10). Those claims are the following: (1) Count I, Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress; (2) Count II, Assault; (3) Count III, Battery; and (4) Count IX, Section 1983. (D.I. 1-1). The briefing is complete. (D.I. 11; D.I. 14; D.I. 15). I reviewed supplemental letters relating to the § 1983…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Washington v. HarperSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Andrews v. City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- International Security, LLC v. BerryDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2021
- SAMMUT v. VALENZANO WINERY LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
- Zimmerman v. International Longshoreman's Association Local 1694District Court, D. Delaware · 2024