Ide v. Harwood
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Plaintiff commenced this action in the district court for Hennepin -county, and garnished Curtis H. Pettit, the assignee of defendant under an assignment for the benefit of creditors.
Read the full summary
Plaintiff commenced this action in the district court for Hennepin -county, and garnished Curtis H. Pettit, the assignee of defendant under an assignment for the benefit of creditors. Upon the disclosure of the garnishee, plaintiff obtained leave to file a supplemental complaint against the garnishee, seeking to reach not only the funds in the hands of the garnishee at the time the garnishee summons was served, but also the book-accounts owing by Harwood’s debtors, •and which had been included in the assignment to the garnishee. Tarious creditors of Harwood, who had garnished his debtors…
1Opinion of the Court
DicKinson, J.*
The defendant Harwood, being largely indebted to this plaintiff and to numerous other persons, made a general assignment to the garnishee, Pettit, for the benefit of his creditors. The assignment included book-accounts owing to Harwood. The account-books in which these debts were charged came into the possession of Pettit as such assignee. This plaintiff thereafter commenced an action against Harwood to recover his debt, and in the action garnished Pettit by the service of a garnishee summons upon him. By supplemental complaint, filed after the disclosure of the garnishee, the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Swart v. ThomasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
- Brower v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1863
3Cited by6 opinions
- Henderson v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Redmond v. Commissioners of the Town of TarboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- Barton v. SpencerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
- Elliott v. BowmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1885
- Joseph v. Sing WarnHawaii Supreme Court · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.