Koelker v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
GRIM, District Judge.
Alleging that she was laid off without good cause from her position as a telephone operator in the station at Washington, D. C., the employee brings this diversity action against her employer, the railroad company, for loss of salary and for punitive damages. The employer has moved to dismiss for want of jurisdiction. It has also moved for summary judgment in its favor.
In cases involving grievances under labor agreements, as does this, the *889National Railroad Adjustment Board lias exclusive primary jurisdiction and "this court has no jurisdiction until the services of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Slocum v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Order of Railway Conductors v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Bower v. Eastern Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
- Lee v. Virginian Railway Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1955
3Cited by9 opinions
- Rumbaugh v. Winifrede Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
- Phillips v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
- Gunther v. San Diego & Arizona Eastern Railway Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1958
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1964
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad Company (Lines East)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.