Legal Opinion
State v. Indus. Comm. 169
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided June 28, 2007No. 06AP-391PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] {¶ 1} In this original action, relator, Richard Pierron, asks this court to issue a writ of mandamus ordering respondent Industrial Commission of Ohio to vacate its order denying him temporary total disability ("TTD") compensation on the grounds that he had voluntarily abandoned his employment with respondent Sprint/United Telephone Company ("employer") and to enter an order granting that compensation.
{¶ 2} The court referred this matter to a magistrate pursuant…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State ex rel. Teece v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- State ex rel. Rockwell International v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State ex rel. McCoy v. Dedicated Transport, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
- State ex rel. McCoy v. Dedicated Transport, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
- State Ex Rel. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Powertrain v. Hudson, 06ap-1268 (12-18-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- State Ex Rel Wilson v. Indus. Comm'n., 08ap-444 (3-26-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- State Ex Rel. Ford Motor Co. v. Indus. Comm., 08ap-218 (12-11-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State ex rel. Jones v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
- State ex rel. Pierron v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2007