Legal Opinion

Bevan v. Wolfson

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 29, 1994No. 93-00262PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant, Brian Bevan, challenges the orders of the trial court granting the petitions for injunction for protection against repeat violence that were filed by appellee, Joel Wolfson, and by appellee, Ursula Wolfson. See § 784.046, Fla.Stat. (1991). We dismiss the appeal as moot.

Both injunctions expired on December 15, 1993, and thus are no longer in effect. The Florida Supreme Court has held that:

An issue is moot when the controversy has been so fully resolved that a judicial determination can have no actual effect. A case is “moot” when it presents no actual controversy or when the issues…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Godwin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McCabe Hamilton & Renny Co., Ltd. v. ChungHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Murphy v. ReynoldsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  3. Wilcox v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  4. BARBARA MOLINA v. JOSEPH RICHARD VALENZUELADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  5. Fletcher v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API