State v. Delcambre

Charlette and Nolan Delcambre appeal from their convictions of theft in the first degree by means of welfare fraud, alleging that the information filed against them was constitutionally defective. The Delcambres waived their right to a jury trial and were convicted on stipulated facts. Their motion for arrest of judgment, asserting the defect in the information, was denied and they appeal. We affirm.

*682The Delcambres argue that the absence of an allegation of an "intent to deprive" in the information makes the information constitutionally defective because it fails to charge each "specified…