Legal Opinion

Weinberger v. Catholic Action of Hawaii/Peace Education Project

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 1, 1981No. 80-1377PublishedCited by 138 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rehnquist

The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that § 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), 83 Stat. 853, 42 U. S. C. §4332(2)(C), requires the Navy to prepare and release to the public a “Hypothetical Environmental Impact Statement” with regard to the opera*141tion of a facility capable of storing nuclear weapons. Catholic Action of Hawaii/Peace Education Project v. Brown, 643 F. 2d 569, 572 (1980). Because we conclude that the “Hypothetical Environmental Impact Statement” is a creature of judicial cloth, not legislative cloth, and that it is not mandated by any of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Environmental Protection Agency v. MinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Kleppe v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Kissinger v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. United States v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by138 opinions

  1. Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Tenet v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Municipio de San Juan v. Junta de Calidad Ambiental, AdministraciónSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1999
  5. Aron Dibacco v. United States ArmyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015

133 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API