Legal Opinion
Aron Dibacco v. United States Army
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided July 31, 2015No. 13-5353PublishedCited by 207 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge MILLETT.
MILLETT, Circuit Judge:
Removing the cloak from the cloak-and-dagger business of spying can be a lengthy and arduous process. Understandably so, given the competing needs to protect national security and to ensure appropriate governmental transparency. The 30-year odyssey of this Freedom of Information Act ease attests to the complex twists and turns that the disclosure process can take.
In 1985, Carl Oglesby filed a request under the Freedom of Information Act with six federal agencies, seeking information on Reinhard Gehlen, a former Nazi…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Robert G. Vaughn v. Bernard Rosen, Executive Director, United States Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Safecard Services, Inc. v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
- Carl Oglesby v. The United States Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- King v. BurwellSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Kissinger v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by207 opinions
- Mobley v. Central Intelligence AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Keith McGillCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- Aguiar v. Drug Enforcement AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Hardy v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and ExplosivesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Hunton & Williams LLP v. U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
202 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.