Jones v. City of Durham
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1DissentJustice Martin
“[N]o person shall be deprived of a trial on a genuine disputed factual issue.” Kessing v. Nat’l Mortgage Corp., 278 N.C. 523, 534,180 S.E.2d 823, 830 (1971). Summary judgment in a negligence case is rarely appropriate under North Carolina jurisprudence. Moore v. Crumpton, 306 N.C. 618, 624, 295 S.E.2d 436, 440 (1982). As Justice (later Chief Justice) Mitchell stated for this Court in Moore: “Even where there is no dispute as to the essential facts, where reasonable people could differ with respect to whether a party acted with reasonable care, it ordinarily remains the province of the jury…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Travis v. City of MesquiteTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Meyer v. WallsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
- Kidd v. EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.