Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Riehl

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided November 27, 2024No. 3:24-cv-00993Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT Jaquan Marquise Bailey, Plaintiff, Civil No. 3:24-cv-00993-SVN v. Joseph Riehl, et al, Defendants. November 27, 2024 RECOMMENDED RULING RE: MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS Plaintiff Jaquan Marquise Bailey, representing himself, filed a Complaint alleging that various Connecticut judges, prosecutors, law enforcement officers, and others conspired against him in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3) (“Section 1985”) and deprived him of his constitutional rights in violation of

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(“Section 1983”).1 ECF No. 1. Plaintiff is…

2Cases cited42 opinions

Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.