Legal Opinion

United States v. Esso Standard Oil Company of Puerto Rico

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 27, 1967No. 15790_1PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStaley, Chief Judge

OPINION OF THE COURT

Esso Standard Oil Company of Puerto Rico (hereinafter “Esso”) was convicted on two charges of the offense of discharging refuse into navigable waters in violation of § 13 of the Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 U.S.C.A. § 407 (1957), and was fined $1,000 for each violation. The trial judge, sitting without a jury, found that on two occasions, Esso had caused liquid petroleum products to be' spilled upon its land, that these products flowed over the ground into the ocean, and that such conduct violated § 13. Esso urged that its conduct was not within the acts proscribed by § 13,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Republic Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. United States v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. United States v. Ballard Oil Co. Of Hartford, IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
  4. La MercedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. United States v. Pennsylvania Industrial Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. United States v. Sexton Cove Estates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  3. United States v. CiampittiDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1984
  4. United States v. Pennsylvania Industrial Chemical Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
  5. United States v. United States Steel CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1970

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API