Legal Opinion

Superlite Builders & Insurance Co. of North America v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 29, 1980No. 1 CA-IC 2214PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HAIRE, Judge.

The essential question raised in this review is whether permanent physical impairment resulting solely from nontraumatic recurrent hernias will support an unscheduled award.

Respondent employee Charles Chapman has a history of recurrent hernias going back as far as 1957. The medical and procedural history of the current claim is a complex one. The record indicates that respondent was injured on June 15, 1974 while working as a dock worker for petitioner employer, Superlite Builders. The injury was diagnosed as a bilateral inguinal hernia. On September 23, 1974 surgery was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Williams v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Cotton v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  3. Imrich v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  4. Heidler v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  5. Boggs v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. County of Maricopa v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  2. Capuano v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  3. Salt River Project/Bechtel Corp. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  4. Miller v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  5. Hanley v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API