Lupien v. Malsbenden
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
McKUSICK, Chief Justice.
Defendant Frederick Malsbenden appeals a judgment of the Superior Court (York County) holding him to partnership liability on a written contract entered into between plaintiff Robert Lupien and one Stephen Cragin doing business as York Motor Mart. 1 The sole issue asserted on appeal is whether the Superior Court erred in its finding that Malsbenden and Cragin were partners in the pertinent part of York Motor Mart’s business. We affirm.
On March 5, 1980, plaintiff entered into a written agreement with Stephen Cragin, doing business in the town of York as York Motor Mart,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Beecher v. BushMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Dalton v. AustinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Cumberland County Power & Light Co. v. GordonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1939
- Roux v. LawandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1932
- James Bailey Co. v. DarlingSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1920
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ingram v. DeereTexas Supreme Court · 2009
- New England Herald Development Group v. Town of FalmouthSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
- Lichtenstein v. Consolidated Services Group, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 1997
- Ingram v. DeereTexas Supreme Court · 2009
- Jesse C. Ingram, ph.D. and Behavioral Psychology Clinic, P.C. v. Louis Deere, D.O. and Hillvale Medical Group Association D/B/A Hillvale Medical AssociationTexas Supreme Court · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.