Montgomery v. Allen
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne. (Gartner, J.) Negligence case. Defendant brings ' error. The facts necessary to a decision of the case are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
This is an action to recover damages for the alleged negligence of the defendant in driving his carriage into and against the carriage in which plaintiff and another were riding.
Plaintiff, upon cross-examination, testified that one Dr. Dakin attended her and prescribed for her. On redirect examination she testified, without objection, that Dr. Dakin told her he was sent by Mrs. Allen, the wife of defendant, to settle with her; and that he made an offerof compromise. Dr. Dakin was called as a witness for defendant, and testified that he told plaintiff that he had advised Mrs. Allen to settle…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Germain v. Union School DistrictMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Crane v. RossMichigan Supreme Court · 1912