Legal Opinion

Arm, Inc. v. Terrazas

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 9, 1975No. 1 CA-CIV 2602PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FROEB, Judge.

This appeal arises from an order of the trial court granting a motion for partial summary judgment. The trial court found no genuine issue of material fact and held as a matter of law that the remedy of a constructive trust was inapplicable. We agree and affirm the judgment.

While there is controversy as to some facts, the record indicates that there is no genuine issue presented as to.those which are hereafter set forth.

On September 4, 1968, Filbert Terrazas and Eloise Terrazas, his wife, appellees, (hereafter, referred to as Terrazas) purchased an unimproved lot at 1245…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Beatty v. . Guggenheim Exploration Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Bangor Punta Operations, Inc. v. Bangor & Aroostook RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Hunter v. HunterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Norman v. Transamerica Title InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Luplow v. Pasqualetti Properties, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Johnson v. American National InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
  2. Harmon v. HarmonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
  3. Amtitle Trust Company v. FitchCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  4. Ray Lumber Co. v. Legend Homes, Inc. (In Re Legend Homes, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 1987
  5. Canzone v. Hammon (In Re Hammon)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API