Legal Opinion

People v. Bias

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 26, 1985No. 4-84-0299PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mills

Armed robbery — jury—six years.

No evidence as to the nature of the instrumentality used to persuade the victim to part with his billfold — except that it may have been a sharp fingernail.

Since no portion of the human anatomy is legally a dangerous weapon, we reduce Bias’ conviction to simple robbery and remand for resentencing.

Because Bias also asserts that the victim’s identification testimony was insufficient to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that she was the robber, a rather detailed summary of the evidence is required.

EVIDENCE

The State’s first witness, Everett Jackson, testified that…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. Melvin TelfaireCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  2. People v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  3. People v. SkeltonIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  4. United States v. Charles HodgesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
  5. People v. ElamIllinois Supreme Court · 1972

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. People v. SlimIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Howell v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2003
  3. People v. AguilarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. People v. HolmesIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. CromedySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API