Legal Opinion

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Schoenecker (In Re Schoenecker)

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 2018No. 2011AP000048-DPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

*646¶ 1 Attorney James M. Schoenecker has appealed Referee James W. Mohr Jr.'s *848recommendation that Attorney Schoenecker's petition for the reinstatement of his license to practice law in Wisconsin be denied. Upon careful review, we agree with the referee that Attorney Schoenecker has failed to meet his burden of proof to establish the requirements for reinstatement at this time. Accordingly, we accept the referee's recommendation that the petition for reinstatement be denied. However, we determine that Attorney Schoenecker can again petition for reinstatement six months after the date of this…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proc. Against PennWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  2. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against CarrollWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. James M. SchoeneckerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. SchoeneckerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. JenningsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. OLR v. James M. SchoeneckerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2019
  2. OLR v. James M. SchoeneckerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. James M. SchoeneckerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Schoenecker (In Re Schoenecker)Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API