James v. Brooks

These two causes, involving the same questions of law and of fact, were consolidated and heard together in the Chancery Court at Rutledge.

Actions of ejectment had been instituted in the Circuit Court of Grainger county by the complainant against the defendants, and they were pending at the time of the filing of said bills.

The complainant alleges that his remedy at law may be embarrassed by reason of the omission by mistake of one call in one of the deeds under which he claims title to the land in controversy, and prays that said mistake be corrected, and that he be put in possession of the…