Legal Opinion
Glenda KLEEMAN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondent-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 8, 1997No. 96-10360PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS, Circuit Judge:
In this most unusual case, we review a determination of the United States Parole Commission (“the Commission”) under a treaty between the United States and the Republic of Mexico that permits citizens of one country convicted.of a crime in the other to serve the sentence in the prisoner’s home country. In addition to approving the transfer, the receiving country must determine the most analogous offense of conviction and sentence the prisoner accordingly.
Glenda Kleeman (“Kleeman”), a United States citizen, appeals the Commission’s decision determining her…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Juan Buenrostro-TorresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Brady v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Michael Mitchell PaulCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Anthony Darrell LesinaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Lopez QuinteroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Erma J. James v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Lizama v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Frascarelli v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- Iljas Cafi v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Odili v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.