Legal Opinion
Coggins v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)
Decided March 3, 2005No. 06-04-00044-CRPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Chief Justice MORRISS.
From his jury conviction for misdemean- or driving while intoxicated, 1 Christopher Dean Coggins appeals with two points of error, (1) that he was denied due process because he was not allowed to take a breathalyzer test and because there was no videotape of his arrest or intake, any one of which, he says, would have demonstrated to the jury he was not intoxicated and (2) that the evidence was legally and factually insufficient to support the verdict of guilt. We affirm the judgment because we find neither point of error meritorious.
1. Coggins Did Not…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Zuniga v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2009
- Washburn v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2007
- Barclay Edward Berdan II v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2015
- Berdan, Barclay Edward IiCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Charles David Washburn v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.