Legal Opinion

Thomas v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 28, 1992No. 109-91PublishedCited by 266 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

BAIRD, Judge.

A jury convicted appellant and his co-defendant, Ricky James Davis, of murder pursuant to Tex.Penal Code Ann. § 19.-02(a)(1). The trial judge assessed appellant’s punishment at confinement for life. Tex.Penal Code Ann. § 12.42(c). The Court of Appeals affirmed. Davis and Thomas v. State, Nos. 05-89-00496-CR and 05-89-00497-CR, Delivered October 31,1990 (Tex. App. — Dallas 1990) (not published). We granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review to determine whether the Court of Appeals erred in not ordering a new trial…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by266 opinions

  1. McFarland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  2. Wyatt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  3. Pena, Jose LuisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
  4. Hampton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  5. Harm v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006

261 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API